Research News


Clarifying the Effective Allocation of Research Funding to Facilitate Nobel-Prize-Class Research Results and Innovations

image picture Image by Panchenko Vladimir/Shutterstock

Researchers led by the University of Tsukuba have examined all the Grants-in-Aid allocated to life science and medicine since 1991. They found that a higher amount of funding for the recipient researchers is effective in generating emerging and Nobel Prize-winning topics. Additionally, they found that distributing smaller amounts of funding to many researchers as a means of investment efficiency is more effective in facilitating research on Nobel Prize-winning topics.

Tsukuba, Japan—Research funding drives advances in research and leads to discoveries. In the field of basic research, research funds allocated to researchers by public organizations (in Japan, Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research: KAKENHI) account for a large portion of research funds. However, there is an ongoing debate about whether "distributing a small number of research funds to a large number of researchers" or "concentrating a large number of research funds on a small number of excellent researchers" produces more new results and leads to innovation, particularly Nobel-Prize-class discoveries.

This study comprehensively investigated the relationship between the research funds (amount and research category) and the research outcomes (number of publications, number of emerging topics created, and number of Nobel Prize topics created). It considered all Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research allocated to life sciences and medicine since 1991. The findings show that the higher the amount of research funds received, the more the number of research results generated. However, the findings also highlighted that the generation of research results becomes stagnant at 50 million yen. In particular, the generation of Nobel Prize topics decreased compared to before the receipt of research funds. In terms of the efficiency of research output creation based on the total amount of investment, it is clear that distributing smaller amounts of research funds of 5 million yen to a large number of researchers is more effective than distributing a higher amount of research funds to a limited number of researchers, who have excellent research records, in a limited number of research fields.

This research group has established a quantitative identification method for emerging topics and Nobel Prize topics and has also clarified the involvement of researchers in the generation of these topics. The results of this study are expected to provide fundamental insights that can contribute to research policy and research funding administration.

This work was supported by JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) KAKENHI (Gia for Scientific Research ©) to R.L.O. [grant number 20K00266].

Original Paper

Title of original paper:
The effectiveness of Japanese public funding to generate emerging topics in life science and medicine


Associate Professor OHNIWA Ryosuke
Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba

Professor HIBINO Aiko
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hirosaki University

Related Link

Institute of Medicine

Celebrating the 151st{50th Anniversary of the University of Tsukuba
Celebrating the 151st{50th Anniversary of the University of Tsukuba